Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1112

Dealing with Terrorists: Chinese and Indian Way: and Law Courts!

In Jammu and Kashmir Indian State has deployed its para-military forces to maintain law and order there and handle the situation created by the so-called ‘separatists’. These separatists want to separate the state of Jammu and Kashmir from the Union of India.

Why do they want to separate from India? They argue, they have their own separate religion, they have majority who follow this religion, they have democratic right to decide whether to live in India or separate from India, they want to separate from India and live under their religious law. If they are asked a question why they have massacred Pandits in Kashmir valley on the wholesale scale and forced the rest of them who escaped this massacre to flee out of the state, they have no answer.

Again, if they are told that the erstwhile J & K ruler Maharaja Hari Singh had acceded his state to Union of India, which is a secular Union; that those who considered their religion above everything else had been given a separate land (Pakistan); that if they thought similarly, they could have migrated to Pakistan, and for this reason they have no right to again demand a separate land on the basis of their separate religion, they have no answer.

The fact is that without repatriation and accounting of all Kashmir Pandits – killed and displaced, they cannot be said in majority in the state. The truth and justice are above all fraud and force tactics.

The tactics of fraud and force in the name of democratic and human rights is not being employed in India alone by such religious fanatics. It is being employed in China as well.

How does China deal with such tactics? And, how does India deal with such tactics? Indian para-military forces are not less competent than China to deal with such individuals.

But in India the courts of law, which have no experience or understanding of the circumstances under which forces have to work, have a different notions of human rights, and have upper hand in taking decisions. In China it is not so.

Courts will exist only when the state is not challenged and decimated by the terrorist armed bands.

Here are two videos, one of which show how China deals with such terrorists and another show how India deals with the terrorists. An Indian Army veteran has recorded this video and has written his impression about the unfortunate Indian circumstances. First watch these videos.

Video No. 1: Chinese forces deal with religious terrorists in its country’s Uighur province:

 

Video No. 2: Indian forces’ hands are tied down in the name of human rights of the terrorists:

(Note: This video is extremely disturbing and – on second thought – has been self-censured for this reason. In this video, the hooligans are punching Indian army men armed with automatic weapons, which can kill all these trouble makers. But the army personnel show extreme restraint and do not use their weapons. Shame on those who tie down their hands! Shame on those who allow such restraint and deploy sons of mother India, not to kill the ruffians but be killed or prosecuted! )

An Army veteran, who lost a family member to a militant’s bullet, has raised an agonising poser to the Indian courts, “How much do you know about the brutality of war?”

How many of you have sent your progeny to the armed forces?

Have you ever lost a family member in the defence of the country?

Do you know the pain of losing a young son or having a widowed daughter or seeing your grandchildren grow up without their father?

If not, please do not impede our war effort. Human rights sound very nice when you and your families are safely ensconced in secure air-conditioned homes but not when you are facing bullets and stone of an unruly religious fanatic mob.

Applying the Court directions to the Pulwama incident, a FIR will be lodged against the Gunner Rishi Kumar who risked his life and killed two terrorists despite being hit on his headgear.

Police investigations will carry on for years haunting him even when posted to other places in India.

Courts will issue summons and demand his presence. He will be accused of depriving the ‘innocent’ jihadis of their human rights and asked to justify the killings.

He will be queried, “Are you sure they were terrorists? They did not kill you, why did you kill them?”

He will be asked, “Did you give them adequate opportunity to surrender and reform themselves?” “Did you give them a fair chance to escape?” “Did you fire warning shots in the air?”

Instead of lauding his bravery, he will be subjected to judicial witch-hunt. What a disgrace for the nation!

Subjecting active military operations to judicial review is an outlandish idea. Whereas all nations empower their soldiers to vanquish enemies of the state, India takes pride in shackling them.

While addressing the U.S. Naval Academy in April 2010, Secretary of Defence Robert M Gates of USA had said, “You have answered the trumpet call. For my part, I consider myself personally responsible for each and every one of you as though you were my own sons and daughters. And when I send you in harm’s way, as I will, I will do everything in my power to see that you have what you need to accomplish your mission – and come home safely.”

Apparently, Indian courts think differently. Human rights of the enemies of the state appear to be far more important than the security of the country.

Finally, as a serving officer commented wryly, “Our courts have given us two options – “get killed and the country will honour your martyrdom” or “kill the terrorist and face police/judicial investigations for years.”

His apprehensions are genuine and shared by the most. One wonders which soldier will look forward to serving in such antagonistic environment!

Everyone cannot fight for India on borders but one can fight for our Soldiers Betterment from the safety of our homes.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1112

Trending Articles